Debating
|
|
|
|
Student Work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
The class chose two topics to debate: "Which is better: a meat-based or vegetarian
diet?" and "Which is better: single-sex or co-education?"
Rubrics and Teacher Comments on Student Work
Students Name______-
Debate Team__VEGETARIAN_
| |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
| Technology + |
Learner found 5 items on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
Learner found 3 items on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
Learner found 1 item on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
N/A |
| Reading |
Read and took notes on three or more articles
relevant to topic |
Read and took notes on two articles relevant to
topic |
Read and took notes on one article relevant to
topic |
3 |
| Writing |
Was able to accurately summarize and synthesize
the readings |
Was somewhat able to summarize and synthesize
the readings |
Was minimally able to summarize and synthesize
the readings |
3 |
| Speaking |
Participated actively in pre-debate discussion
with teammates |
Participated moderately in pre-debate
discussion with teammates |
Participated little in pre-debate discussion
with teammates |
3 |
| Listening |
Demonstrated thorough understanding of
classmates input |
Demonstrated moderate understanding of
classmates input |
Demonstrated little understanding of
classmates input |
3 |
| Speaking |
Used persuasive language appropriately
85-100% of the time while debating |
Used persuasive language appropriately
75-85% of the time while debating |
Used persuasive language appropriately
60-75% of the time while debating |
3 |
| Speaking |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 90-100% of the
time while debating |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 80-90% of the
time while debating |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 65-80% of the
time while debating |
3 |
| Tone |
Excellent use of expression
and tone |
Good use of expressions and tone |
Fair use of expression and tone |
2 |
| Eye Contact |
Excellent use of eye contact |
Good use of eye contact |
Fair use of eye contact |
3 |
| Writing |
Arguments in essay were clearly expressed * |
Arguments in essay were somewhat clearly
expressed * |
Arguments in essay were not clearly expressed *
|
3 |
| Writing |
Essay showed excellent control of essay form* |
Essay showed satisfactory control of essay
form* |
Essay showed little control of essay form* |
3 |
| Writing |
Essay showed excellent control of grammar* |
Essay showed satisfactory control of grammar* |
Essay showed minimal control of grammar* |
2 |
+ applies only if learners are doing internet searches
* applies only if doing extension activity of essay writing.
Overall score: EXCELLENT
Students participation in the project was excellent. She took extensive notes on
five articles, actively discussed the topic with her teammates and her debate presentation
was well-organized and easy to understand. She also actively participated as an audience
member during the other groups debate.
Student is a vegetarian, but before the debate stated that she did not have much
knowledge about the nutritional aspects of vegetarianism. After reading the articles on
debating, she said that she not only had a better understanding of the nutritional needs
of a vegetarian, but she also was aware of the existence -- and reasons for -- a vegan
lifestyle.
Students Name_______________-
Debate Team__SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLS_
| |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
| Technology + |
Learner found 5 items on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
Learner found 3 items on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
Learner found 1 item on the Internet relevant
to his/her topic+ |
N/A |
| Reading |
Read and took notes on three or more articles
relevant to topic |
Read and took notes on two articles relevant to
topic |
Read and took notes on one article relevant to
topic |
3 |
| Writing |
Was able to accurately summarize and synthesize
the readings |
Was somewhat able to summarize and synthesize
the readings |
Was minimally able to summarize and synthesize
the readings |
3 |
| Speaking |
Participated actively in pre-debate discussion
with teammates |
Participated moderately in pre-debate
discussion with teammates |
Participated little in pre-debate discussion
with teammates |
3 |
| Listening |
Demonstrated thorough understanding of
classmates input |
Demonstrated moderate understanding of
classmates input |
Demonstrated little understanding of
classmates input |
2 |
| Speaking |
Used persuasive language appropriately 85-100% of the time while debating |
Used persuasive language appropriately 75-85% of the time while debating |
Used persuasive language Appropriately 60-75% of the time while debating |
3 |
| Speaking |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 90-100% of the
time while debating |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 80-90% of the
time while debating |
Pronunciation was comprehensible 65-80% of the
time while debating |
3 |
| Tone |
Excellent use of Expression
and tone |
Good use of expressions and tone |
Fair use of expression and tone |
3 |
| Eye Contact |
Excellent use of eye contact |
Good use of eye contact |
Fair use of eye contact |
2 |
| Writing |
Arguments in essay were clearly expressed * |
Arguments in essay were somewhat clearly
expressed * |
Arguments in essay were not clearly expressed *
|
N/A |
| Writing |
Essay showed excellent control of essay form* |
Essay showed satisfactory control of essay
form* |
Essay showed little control of essay form* |
N/A |
| Writing |
Essay showed excellent control of grammar* |
Essay showed satisfactory control of grammar* |
Essay showed minimal control of grammar* |
N/A |
+ applies only if learners are doing internet searches
* applies only if doing extension activity of essay writing.
Overall score: EXCELLENT
Students participation in the project was excellent. She took notes on three
articles, and really tried to help her teammates coordinate their work. She was easy to
understand and made a good deal of eye contact during the debate. As an audience member,
she asked many thoughtful questions.
Student had just started attending the class, when we began the project. Her reading
and writing skills were very strong, but her spoken English and aural comprehension were
weaker. The week prior to the debating unit, Student had spoken to me of her concern that
her classmates couldnt understand her. After the debate, Chris told me that the
debate helped give her confidence about her ability to make herself understood.
Chiyoko
Coeducation is the Best Choice for High School
In most part of world, most of people would agree that both boys
and girls should attend high school. However, the question is whether the high school
should be co-educational or a single-sex school. A coeducational high school offers the
best education for both sexes.
First of all, it is natural environment. As we know, the real
world consists of both sexes. Why not at school? If not, boys and girls cant prepare
for society. If they are separately educated, they will be interested in the opposite sex
too much.
Coeducation can provide both sexes an equal opportunity. Boys
and girls can participate in same classes and activities. On the contrary, at a single sex
school, girls are discouraged to compete with boys intellectually.
It is essential for both sexes at high school age, to get each
other as classmates, not as dates. First of all, experiments of learning together help
both sexes to break stereotypes and to deepen their understanding of each other. Secondly,
difficult situations about sex, like sexual harassment, happen because of
misunderstandings.
As everyone agrees, learners at high school age have not matured
yet. Therefore, they have a lot of flexibilities in their identities, ideas, and concepts.
If boys and girls miss chances to know each other adequately at that critical period, they
cant reach the ultimate goal, real equal partnership between male and female, in
their future.
11/19/98
Nowadays, there are a large number of people that practice
vegetarianism in the world. According to recent research, more and more people are opting
for a vegetarian diet. They have concluded that it is nothing to lose. In addition the
vegetarian can contribute with the environmental and bring the benefits to animal. People
really think that to be a vegetarian is difficult, impossible, not safe enough, can lose
to much weight, etc.
Contrarily it is pretty easy and safe to be a vegetarian. For
people that have not know idea about vegetarianism should read before making their
conclusions or exchange or not their diet. In other words, people wont believe how
much they will learn about nutrition, vegetables, grains, greens, vitamins and fruits.
Vegetarians are always in a good healthy and also in a good shape instead of fat.
Reading about vegetarianism people will notice ho many diseases
they can avoid. Diabetics for example, there are three or four times more frequently on
meat eater. Furthermore heart disease is the number one killer in the USA.
People dont know why meat cause health problems. Animals
are created in factory farms with less spaces than they need. Therefore, they are
obligated to live with their feces. In contrast with their natural lives. Also the
antibiotics and pesticides are sprayed on feed and on the animals themselves. This animal
products are very dangerous for human.
Vegetarianism it is not just a style of life as lot of people
think it. To be a vegetarian people just need to think in their health. On the other hand,
they will bring benefit to animals and help the ecology.
Top of Page
|