Untitled Document

NYSED Seal

THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234

Office of Innovation and School Reform (OISR)
            5N EB Mezzanine
                                    Phone: (518)473-8852
                                   Fax:518)473-4502

Non-Receivership Schools ONLY

Final Report:January 31, 2017 to April 28, 2017and Continuation Plan for the 2017-18 School Year

School		School BEDS Code	District	SIG/SIF Model and Cohort		Required EPO (Restart, Innovation and Reform Framework)

School Principal			Superintendent (EPO)	Grade Configuration	Total Enrollment	% ELL	% SWD
Name	Date of Appointment

District Person Responsible for Program Oversight and Report Validation	Implementation Status of the School as Rated by the District		Brief Analysis of Rating of Implementation Status
Name and Contact Information	(Red/Yellow/Green)

Key

Green

Expected results for this phase of the project are fully met, work is on budget, and the school is fully implementing this strategy with impact.

Yellow

Some barriers to implementation / outcomes / spending exist; with adaptation/correction school will be able to achieve desired results.

Red

Major barriers to implementation / outcomes / spending encountered; results are at-risk of not being realized; major strategy adjustment is required.

Attention: The document is intended to be completed by the Superintendent of Schools and/or designee and submitted electronically to OISR@NYSED.gov. It is a self-assessment of the implementation and outcomes of key strategies related to the School Improvement Grant (SIG) or the School Innovation Fund (SIF) plan, and as such should not be considered a formal evaluation by the New York State Education Department. This document serves as the Progress Review Report for Non- Receivership schools (not Persistently Struggling or Struggling schools), and as the 2017-18 Continuation Plan for Non-Receivership schools. All responses provided under the “2017-18 School Year Continuation Plan” heading should directly align with or be adaptations to the approved SIG or SIF plan. Note: Schools no longer receiving SIG or SIF funds during the 2017-18 school year should NOT complete the Continuation Plan.

Directions - District and school staff should respond to the Analysis/Report Out sections by both analyzing and summarizing the key strategies of the during this reporting period in light of their realized level of implementation and their impact on student learning outcomes. 2017-18 Continuation Plan sections provide staff with an opportunity to describe proposed actions and adaptations to the plan. The Continuation Plan is intended to create the framework by which the school transitions from the current year, using its own summary analysis, to the upcoming school year in a manner that represents continuous and comprehensive planning. Staff should consider the impact of proposed key strategies on student learning, as well as their long-term sustainability and connectivity to diagnostic review feedback.

METRICS

Academic Achievement - Please respond to each component of each prompt. If necessary, attach samples of data collection that are referenced in the response. The 2016-17 data and the Analysis/Report Out section should align with the 2016-17 Attachment B. Discuss the goals/key strategies from the approved SIG or SIF plan which are aligned with this metric.
Key Questions/Prompts	2016-17 Analysis / Report Out
Disaggregate student assessment data in core content areas to identify performance trends (e.g., student sub-groups, grade levels, subjects, classrooms).
	2017-18 Continuation Plan
Based on the performance trends noted above, please identify the specific school strategy adjustments or interventions to be implemented to meet the academic achievement targets.

Student Attendance - Average Daily Student Attendance Rate. The number of school days during the regular school week students attended school divided by the maximum number of days students could have attended school during the regular school week. The 2016-17 data and the Analysis/Report Out section should align with the 2016-17 Attachment B. Discuss the goals/key strategies from the approved SIG or SIF plan which are aligned with this metric.
2016-17	Baseline (%)	2016-17 Target	Year to Date
Student Attendance Rate (%)
Key Questions/Prompts	Analysis / Report Out			2017-18 Continuation Plan
Describe patterns of student attendance data (e.g., late/miss first period, chronic absenteeism among certain students, grade levels, etc.).
How do these data/patterns suggest the need for specific strategy adjustment or intervention to ensure targets will be met? Please identify specific school actions to be taken.

Teacher Attendance – Average Daily Teacher Attendance Rate. The number of FTE days teachers worked divided by the maximum number of FTE-teacher working days during the week. The 2016-17 data and the Analysis/Report Out section should align with the 2016-17 Attachment B. Discuss the goals/key strategies from the approved SIG or SIF plan which are aligned with this metric.
2016-17	Baseline (%)	2016-17 Target	Year to Date
Teacher Attendance Rate (%)
Key Questions/Prompts	Analysis / Report Out			2017-18 Continuation Plan
Describe patterns of teacher attendance data (e.g., long-term, excused vs. unexcused, chronic/patterned absenteeism among certain teachers, etc.).
How do these data/patterns suggest the need for specific strategy adjustment or intervention to ensure targets will be met? Please identify specific school actions to be taken.

Office Discipline Referrals – Number of Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs). The total number of Office Discipline Referrals for any reasons that disrupt the educational process. These data should be reported here as total number by week. The 2016-17 data and the Analysis/Report Out section should align with the 2016-17 Attachment B. Discuss the goals/key strategies from the approved SIG or SIF plan which are aligned with this metric.
2016-17	Baseline (#)	2016-17 Target	Year to Date
Office Discipline Referrals (#)
Key Questions/Prompts	Analysis / Report Out			2017-18 Continuation Plan
Describe patterns of office discipline referrals (e.g., period, location, classroom, grade level, repeat offenders, etc.).
How do these data/patterns suggest the need for specific strategy adjustment or intervention to ensure targets will be met? Please identify specific school actions to be taken.

Extended Learning Time – Average Extended Learning Time (ELT). Please respond to the prompts below with respect to extended learning opportunities offered to all students throughout the course of the school year. The 2016-17 data and the Analysis/Report Out section should align with the 2016-17 Attachment B. Discuss the goals/key strategies from the approved SIG or SIF plan which are aligned with this metric.
Key Questions/Prompts	Analysis / Report Out	2017-18 Continuation Plan
How do data/trends suggest the need for specific strategy adjustment or intervention to ensure targets will be met? Please identify specific school actions to be taken.
Describe the type, nature and frequency of assessments that measure the impact of ELT, as well as patterns noted through analysis of data.

PROJECT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Key Strategies - Identify the key strategies identified in the in the approved SIG or SIF plan that were implemented during the current reporting period, but were *NOT* already discussed in the Metrics section above. (Add additional rows as needed.)
Key Strategies Identify the key strategy from your approved SIG/SIF application or Continuation Plan to be discussed.	Implementation Status Identify strategy as R/Y/G	Identify the evidence that supports your assessment of the implementation of key strategies and their impact on student achievement.	2017-18 Continuation Plan
1.
2.
3.
3.
4.

FRAMEWORK AND EPO: (For SIF schools, and SIG Cohort 6 and 7 schools that selected the Innovation Framework, and Restart ONLY)

Identify the school’s model, framework, and the EPO.

Status (R, Y, G)

Identify the evidence that supports your assessment of the implementation of the design framework and its impact on student achievement. Describe the manner in which the EPO has been involved in the implementation.

2017-18 Continuation Plan

BUDGET/FISCAL: Add rows as needed.)

Budget Analysis

Describe the SIG or SIF item or activity found in the approved 2016-17 SIG or SIF FS-10.

Status (R/Y/G)

If expenditures from the approved 16-17 FS-10 and Budget Narrative are on target, describe their impact with regard to the implementation of the SIG or SIF plan. If there is a challenge with expenditures, discuss the course correction to be put in place.

As applicable, and along with this report/plan, please submit a 2017-18 SIG FS-10 budget, Budget Narrative, Attachment D: Budget Summary, and M/WBE documents.

DO NOT SUBMIT PSSG BUDGET DOCUMENTS AT THIS TIME.

BUDGET FORMS ARE AVAILABLE AT: http://www.oms.nysed.gov/cafe/forms/.

The University of the State of New York
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Albany, NY 12234

2017-18
School Improvement Grant 1003(g)

Continuation Plan Cover Page

District Name
School Name
Contact Person		Telephone ( )
E-Mail Address
I hereby certify that I am the applicant’s chief school/administrative officer and that the information contained in this application is, to the best of my knowledge, complete and accurate. I further certify, to the best of my knowledge, that any ensuing program and activity will be conducted in accordance with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, application guidelines and instructions, Assurances, Certifications, the terms and conditions outlined in the Master Grant Contract and that the requested budget amounts are necessary for the implementation of this project. It is understood by the applicant that this application constitutes an offer and, if accepted by the NYS Education Department or renegotiated to acceptance, will form a binding agreement. It is also understood by the applicant that immediate written notice will be provided to the grant program office if at any time the applicant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
Authorized Signature (in blue ink)	Title of Chief School/Administrative Officer
Typed Name:	Date: