
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Click here for PDF Format for printing
February 2004
| TO: | District Superintendents | |
| Presidents of Boards of Education | ||
| New York City Department of Education | ||
| Superintendents of Schools | ||
| Superintendents of State-Operated Schools | ||
| Organizations, Parents and Individuals Concerned with Special Education |
| |
Directors of Special Education | |
Directors of Pupil Personnel Services | |
Chairpersons of Committees on Special Education | |
Chairpersons of Committees on Preschool Special Education | |
Directors of Approved Preschool Programs and Preschool Educators | |
New York City Committee on Preschool Special Education Chairpersons
and Administrators | |
New York City Committee on Special Education Chairpersons and
Administrators | |
Early Childhood Direction Centers | |
Impartial Hearing Officers | |
New York State Community Dispute Resolution Centers | |
Commissioner's Advisory Panel for Special Education Services | |
SETRC Project Directors and Professional Development Specialists | |
Independent Living Centers |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Rebecca Cort, Ed., Interim Deputy Commissioner |
|
|
|
SUBJECT: Amendment to Section 200.5 of the
Regulations of the Commissioner of Education | |
On February 23, 2004, the Board of Regents approved amendments to section 200.5 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education to prescribe procedures to ensure that impartial hearings are conducted in a timely manner pursuant to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its implementing regulations (34 CFR Part 300). These regulations are effective on a permanent basis May 1, 2004. The amendments are attached and summarized below:
simplifying or clarifying the issues;
establishing date(s) for the completion of the hearing;
identifying evidence to be entered into the record;
identifying witnesses expected to provide testimony; and/or
addressing other administrative matters as the impartial hearing officer deems necessary to complete a timely hearing.
the impact on the child’s educational interest or well-being which might be occasioned by the delay;
the need of a party for additional time to prepare or present the party’s position at the hearing in accordance with the requirements of due process;
- any financial or other detrimental consequences likely to be suffered by a party in the event of delay; and
- whether there has already been a delay in the proceeding through the actions of one of the parties.
If you have any questions regarding these regulatory changes, please contact the Special Education Policy Unit at (518) 473-2878 or your Regional Associate at one of the following Special Education Quality Assurance Regional Offices:
| Central Regional Office | (315) 428-3287 |
| Eastern Regional Office | (518) 486-6366 |
| Hudson Valley Regional Office | (914) 245-0010 |
| Long Island Regional Office | (631) 884-8530 |
| New York City Regional Office | (718) 722-4544 |
| Western Regional Office | (585) 344-2002 |
|
Repealed language is in brackets [ ] Added language is underlined _____ |
AMENDMENT TO THE REGULATIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Pursuant to sections 101, 207, 305, 4402, 4403 and 4404 of the Education Law.
1. Paragraph (3) of subdivision (i) of section 200.5 of the Regulations of the
Commissioner is amended, effective May 1, 2004, as follows:
(3) The board of education shall arrange for such a hearing to be conducted
in accordance with the following rules:
(i) Appointment from the impartial hearing officer list must be made in
accordance with the rotational selection process established in section
200.2(e)(1) of this Part and the administrative procedures established by the
board of education pursuant to section 200.2(b)(9) of this Part.
(a) The rotational selection process must be initiated immediately, but not
later than two business days after receipt by the school district of the written
request for the hearing.
(b) The impartial hearing officer may not accept appointment unless he or she
is available to initiate the hearing within the first 14 days of being
appointed [contacted] by the school district.
(ii) The board of education or trustees shall immediately appoint an
impartial hearing officer to conduct the hearing. A board of education may
designate one or more of its members to appoint the impartial hearing officer.
(iii) The hearing, or a prehearing conference, shall be scheduled to begin
within the first 14 days of the impartial hearing officer's appointment, unless
an extension is granted pursuant to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (4) of this
subdivision.
(iv) The impartial hearing officer shall be authorized to administer
oaths and to issue subpoenas in connection with the administrative proceedings
before him/her.
[(iv)] (v) A written or, at the option of the parents, electronic
verbatim record of the proceedings before the impartial hearing officer
shall be maintained and made available to the parties.
[(v)] (vi) At all stages of the proceeding, where required,
interpreters of the deaf, or interpreters fluent in the native language of the
student’s parent, shall be provided at district expense.
[(vi) The impartial hearing officer shall preside at the hearing and shall
provide all parties an opportunity to present evidence and testimony.]
(vii) The parties to the proceeding may be accompanied and advised by legal
counsel and by individuals with special knowledge or training with respect to
the problems of students with disabilities. At all stages of the proceeding,
the impartial hearing officer may assist an unrepresented party by providing
information relating only to the hearing process. Nothing contained in this
subparagraph shall be construed to impair or limit the authority of an impartial
hearing officer to ask questions of counsel or witnesses for the purpose of
clarification or completeness of the record.
(viii) In the event the impartial hearing officer requests an
independent evaluation as part of a hearing, the cost of the evaluation must be
at public expense.
(ix) In the event the impartial hearing officer determines that the interests
of the parent are opposed to or are inconsistent with those of the
student, or that for any other reason the interests of the student would best be
protected by appointment of a guardian ad litem, the impartial hearing officer
shall appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the interests of such student,
unless a surrogate parent shall have previously been assigned. The impartial
hearing officer shall ensure that the procedural due process rights afforded to
the student’s parent pursuant to this section are preserved throughout the
hearing whenever a guardian ad litem is appointed.
(x) The hearing shall be conducted at a time and place which is reasonably
convenient to the parent and student involved and shall be closed to the public
unless the parent requests an open hearing.
(xi) A prehearing conference with the parties may be scheduled. Such
conference may be conducted by telephone. A transcript or a written summary of
the prehearing conference shall be entered into the record by the impartial
hearing officer. A prehearing conference is for the purposes of:
(a) simplifying or clarifying the issues;
(b) establishing date(s) for the completion of the hearing;
(c) identifying evidence to be entered into the record;
(d) identifying witnesses expected to provide testimony; and/or
(e) addressing other administrative matters as the impartial hearing
officer deems necessary to complete a timely hearing.
(xii) The parents, school authorities, and their respective counsel or
representative, shall have an opportunity to present evidence, compel the
attendance of witnesses and to confront and question all witnesses at the
hearing. Each party shall have the right to prohibit the introduction of any
evidence, the substance of which has not been disclosed to such party at least
five business days before the hearing.
(a) Additional disclosure of information. [At] Except as provided for in
section 201.11 of this Title, at least five business days prior to a
hearing, each party shall disclose to all other parties all evaluations
completed by that date and recommendations based on the offering party’s
evaluations that the party intends to use at the hearing. An impartial hearing
officer may bar any party that fails to comply with this requirement from
introducing the relevant evaluation or recommendation at the hearing without the
consent of the other party.
(b) The impartial hearing officer, wherever practicable, shall enter into
the record a stipulation of facts and/or joint exhibits agreed to by the
parties.
(c) The impartial hearing officer may receive any oral, documentary or
tangible evidence except that the impartial hearing officer shall exclude
evidence that he or she determines to be irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable or
unduly repetitious. The impartial hearing officer may receive testimony by
telephone, provided that such testimony shall be made under oath and shall be
subject to cross examination.
(d) The impartial hearing officer may limit examination of a witness by
either party whose testimony the impartial hearing officer determines to be
irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious.
(e) The impartial hearing officer may limit the number of additional
witnesses to avoid unduly repetitious testimony.
(f) The impartial hearing officer may take direct testimony by affidavit
in lieu of in-hearing testimony, provided that the witness giving such testimony
shall be made available for cross examination.
(g) The impartial hearing officer may receive memoranda of law from the
parties not to exceed 30 pages in length, with typed material in minimum 12
point type (footnotes minimum 10 point type) and not exceeding 6 1/2 by 9 1/2
inches on each page.
(xiii) Each party shall have up to one day to present its case unless the
impartial hearing officer determines that additional time is necessary for a
full, fair disclosure of the facts required to arrive at a decision. Additional
hearing days, if required, shall be scheduled on consecutive days wherever
practicable.
[(xii)] (xiv) The parents shall have the right to determine whether the
student shall attend the hearing.
[(xiii)] (xv) If, by mutual agreement of the parties, the impartial
hearing officer is deemed incapacitated or otherwise unavailable or unwilling to
continue the hearing or issue the decision, the board of education shall rescind
the appointment of the impartial hearing officer and appoint a new impartial
hearing officer in accordance with the procedures as set forth in this
subdivision.
[(xiv)] (xvi) Commencing July l, 2002, each board of education shall
report information relating to the impartial hearing process, including but not
limited to the request for, initiation and completion of each impartial hearing,
to the Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with
Disabilities of the State Education Department in a format and at an interval
prescribed by the commissioner.
2. Paragraph (4) of subdivision (i) of section 200.5 of the Regulations of
the Commissioner is amended, effective May 1, 2004, as follows:
(4) Except as provided in section [200.16(g)(a)] 200.16(g)(9) of this
Part and section 201.11 of this Title, the impartial hearing officer shall
render a decision, and mail a copy of the written, or at the option of the
parents, electronic findings of fact and the decision to the parents, to the
board of education, and to the Office of Vocational and Educational Services for
Individuals with Disabilities (VESID) of the State Education Department, not
later than 45 days after the receipt by the board of education of a request for
a hearing or after the initiation of such a hearing by the board. In cases
where extensions of time have been granted beyond the applicable required
timelines, the decision must be rendered and mailed no later than 14 days from
the date the impartial hearing officer closes the record. The date the record is
closed shall be indicated in the decision. The record of the hearing and the
findings of fact and the decision shall be provided at no cost to the parents.
All personally identifiable information shall be deleted from the copy forwarded
to VESID.
(i) An impartial hearing officer may grant specific extensions of time beyond
the periods set out in this paragraph, in subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (3)
of this subdivision, or in section 200.l6(g)(9) of this Part at the request
of either the school district or the parent. Each extension shall be for no
more than 30 days. The reason for [the] each extension must be
documented in the hearing record. [In such case, the impartial hearing officer
shall render the decision and mail a copy of the written, or at the option of
the parents, electronic findings of fact and the decision to the parents, to the
board of education, and to VESID no later than 14 days from the date the record
is closed, including any post hearing submissions, and the transcript is
received by the impartial hearing officer.]
(ii) The impartial hearing officer may grant a request for an extension
only after fully considering the cumulative impact of the following factors:
(a) the impact on the child’s educational interest or well-being which
might be occasioned by the delay;
(b) the need of a party for additional time to prepare or present the
party’s position at the hearing in accordance with the requirements of due
process;
(c) any financial or other detrimental consequences likely to be suffered
by a party in the event of delay; and
(d) whether there has already been a delay in the proceeding through the
actions of one of the parties.
(iii) Absent a compelling reason or a specific showing of substantial
hardship, a request for an extension shall not be granted because of school
vacations, a lack of availability resulting from the parties' and/or
representatives' scheduling conflicts, settlement discussions between the
parties or other similar reasons. Agreement of the parties is not a sufficient
basis for granting an extension.
(iv) The impartial hearing officer shall respond in writing to each
request for an extension. The response shall become part of the record. The
impartial hearing officer may render an oral decision to an oral request for an
extension, but shall subsequently provide that decision in writing and include
it as part of the record. For each extension granted, the impartial hearing
officer shall set a new date for rendering his or her decision, and notify the
parties in writing of such date.
(v) The impartial hearing officer shall determine when the record is
closed and notify the parties of the date the record is closed. The decision
of the impartial hearing officer shall be based solely upon the record of the
proceeding before the impartial hearing officer, and shall set forth the reasons
and the factual basis for the determination. The decision shall reference the
hearing record to support the findings of fact. The impartial hearing officer
shall attach to the decision a list identifying each exhibit admitted into
evidence. Such list shall identify each exhibit by date, number of pages and
exhibit number or letter. In addition, the decision shall include an
identification of all other items the impartial hearing officer has entered into
the record. The decision shall also include a statement advising the parents
and the board of education of the right of any party involved in the hearing to
obtain a review of such a decision by the State review officer in accordance
with subdivision (j) of this section. The decision of the impartial hearing
officer shall be binding upon both parties unless appealed to the State review
officer.