Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:

 See Overview of the Development of the Annual Performance Report on page 1.

 

Monitoring Priority: Effective General Supervision Part B / General Supervision

Indicator #15: General supervision system (including monitoring, complaints, hearings, etc.) identifies and corrects noncompliance as soon as possible but in no case later than one year from identification.

(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(B))

Measurement:

Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of identification:

a.     # of findings of noncompliance.

b.     # of corrections completed as soon as possible but in no case later than one year from identification.

Percent = [(b) divided by (a)] times 100.

For any noncompliance not corrected within one year of identification, describe what actions, including technical assistance and enforcement actions that the State has taken.

 

FFY

Measurable and Rigorous Target

2005
(2005-06)

100% of noncompliance issues identified through the State’s general supervision system (including monitoring, complaints, hearings, etc.) will be corrected within one year from identification.


Actual Target Data for FFY 2005:

The State's percent of issues of noncompliance identified that were corrected within one year of the report being issued, based on the revised measurement standard, is 83.71% percent.

 

a. # of findings of noncompliance

b. # of corrections completed within one year from identification

SEQA Reviews

604

483

60 day complaints

532

468

Total

1136

951

Percent = [951(b) divided by 1136 (a)] = .8371 times 100 = 83.71 %

 

Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed and Explanation of Progress or Slippage that occurred for FFY 2005:

The 2005-06 data reflected progress from the 2004-05 data.

The percent of issues of noncompliance brought into compliance within 12 months of identification increased from 81.20 percent in 2005 to 83.71 percent in 2006. Factors contributing to this improvement include the increased attention to timeliness, regular reports highlighting the timeliness issue, timely processing of State complaints resulting in prompt attention to the identified non compliant issues. 

For any district/agency represented in the SPP baseline data as not having achieved full compliance within 12 months, and as of September 1, 2006 still remaining in noncompliance, the assigned SEQA staff member has provided intensive intervention and a hierarchy of enforcement procedures have been implemented on a case-by-case basis, as outlined in the SPP.  Those steps included written communication with district/

agency administrators, Boards of Education and BOCES District Superintendents.  In some cases, IDEA funds have been redirected to address areas of noncompliance.  In addition, technical assistance network resources have been directed to assist those districts in correcting remaining instances of noncompliance where appropriate.

 

The following activities were completed:

 

Revisions, with Justification, to Proposed Targets

 

No changes

Revisions, with Justification, Improvement Activities / Timelines / Resources for FFY 2005

The following activities were changed or amended: