Available in Word and PDF Format
SCHOOL DISTRICT SELF-REVIEW
MONITORING PROTOCOL
Revised April 2008
SUSPENSION OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Table of Contents
I. Overview of Self-Review Requirements
II. Timelines for Completion of the Self-Review
III.. Directions for Conducting the Self-Review
IV. Identification of Noncompliance
V. Report to the State Education Department (SED)
VI. SED Review of Self-Review Monitoring Report
VII. Correction of Noncompliance
VIII. Technical Assistance Resources
Attachments
Attachment 1: Checklist to Complete the Self-Review
Attachment 2: School District Self-Review Monitoring Protocol
The self-review monitoring protocol on the long-term suspension of students with disabilities must be completed by all school districts identified by the State as having:
disproportionality in their rates of long-term suspensions of students with disabilities by race/ethnicity.
Long-term suspension means an out-of-school suspension of greater than 10 days in a school year. For purposes of this review, data on removal to an interim alternative educational setting (IAES) for reasons of drugs, weapons and serious bodily injury and removals by an impartial hearing officer (IHO) to an IAES upon a determination of dangerousness are not included.
The School District Self-Review Monitoring process must be completed and results reported to SED between August 1 and October 1 of the school year in which the school district is required to conduct the Self-Review.
The Suspension Self-Review Monitoring process is a focused review of a school district’s policies, procedures and practices (i.e., implementation of policies and procedures) that most closely impact the incidence, duration and type of disciplinary action. The review focuses on requirements in the following six areas.
Individual Evaluations of Students with Disabilities. The school district’s evaluation policies, procedures and practices must be reviewed to determine if students with disabilities have received appropriate evaluations upon which to base positive behavioral supports and services that would prevent the behaviors from occurring.
Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). The IEPs of students with disabilities suspended for more than 10 days in a school year must be reviewed to ensure they include positive behavioral supports and services needed to prevent the occurrence of behaviors that impede their learning or that of others.
Behavioral Intervention Plans. Policies, procedures and practices to develop and implement appropriate behavioral intervention plans for students with disabilities must be reviewed to ensure the district is taking appropriate steps to prevent the reoccurrence of a student’s behaviors.
Manifestation Determinations. The district’s policies, procedures and practices relating to manifestation determinations (a review of the relationship of the student’s conduct to the disability) must be made to ensure that students with disabilities are not suspended or removed for more than 10 days in a school year for behaviors related to their disabilities.
General Procedures for Disciplinary Removals. The policies, procedures and practices of the school district must be reviewed to determine if the general procedures for disciplinary actions by school principals and superintendent’s hearings ensure that the rights of students with disabilities under IDEA are protected.
Interim Alternative Educational Settings (IAES) and Instructional Services. The temporary educational settings where students with disabilities are removed and education services provided to such students must be reviewed to ensure that students with disabilities receive the instructional services to which they are entitled.
Forms to Guide the Self-Review
Checklist to Complete the Self-Review (Attachment 1)
A step-by-step process has been outlined to guide the self-review process, including selection of the review team, identification of sources of data and selection of student records, documentation requirements and the process to determine compliance and report to SED.
School District Self-Review Monitoring Protocol (Attachment 2)
This form establishes the protocol to conduct the self-review. The protocol:
specifies the regulatory requirements relating to the six areas above;
identifies documentation (e.g., written policies, classroom visitations, suspension records, teacher interviews, IEPs) that must be reviewed; and
identifies information to “look for” in reviewing that documentation (e.g., look for evidence that functional behavioral assessments include all the required components; consistent application by race/ethnicity).
The school district must use this form to guide the self-review and to document its compliance findings and identify, for self-correction purposes, any corrective action and improvement activities needed to address compliance issues. This form is not submitted to SED, but should be used to guide district steps to self-correct compliance issues.
This form is used to guide the collection of information from individual student records. The School District Self-Review Monitoring Protocol should be referenced in determining what documentation in a student’s record must be reviewed and information to look for in the review of that documentation. Using this form, for each regulatory citation for each individual student in the sample, a determination must be made whether the requirement was met or was not met or was not applicable to the individual student. One form should be used for each student record reviewed. Information from these forms are compiled to determine compliance and documented on Attachment 2. These forms are not submitted to SED, but are collectively used to determine compliance.
This form is a sample of the electronic reporting form the school district will complete to document the results of the district’s self-review to SED. For each regulatory requirement, the district must document its findings of compliance or noncompliance. This information must be submitted electronically to SED between August 1 and October 1, but not later than October 1.
Any absent or inappropriate policy, procedure or practice must be reported as a compliance issue.
For each regulatory citation, instances of compliance noted for fewer than 90 percent of the records reviewed must be indicated on the self-review chart as noncompliance.
If the school district has instances of compliance that are 90 percent or better, then it must ensure it addresses the instances of noncompliance, but for purposes of State reporting, that issue would be reported as in compliance.
The only documentation to be submitted to SED is the electronic submission of the Suspension Self-Review Monitoring Report (Attachment 4). This report must be submitted electronically. To complete this form, go to http://pd.nysed.gov and follow the directions for completion and submission. The district should NOT submit the other forms completed or the documentation reviewed during the self-review unless requested by SED.
Pursuant to the New York State Archives and Records Administration Records Retention and Disposition Schedule ED-1, the school district must maintain documentation of its review for a period of seven years. This documentation is subject to review by SED and therefore should be maintained in an easily retrievable and organized manner.
SED will review the Self-Review Monitoring Report and respond as follows:
If the school district reports to SED that, based on its self-review, the district has not identified any compliance issues relating to its policies, procedures and practices, SED will arrange for a review of that determination.
If the school district reports to SED that, based on its self-review, the district has one or more compliance issues relating to its policies, procedures and practices, SED will notify the district that it must correct all instances of noncompliance not later than one year from the identification of the issues. SED will provide periodic notifications to the school district to ensure correction of noncompliance within a year.
If the school district identifies school district policies, procedures and practices that are not consistent with State and federal requirements, the school district must:
document issues of noncompliance to SED;
document on the self-review protocol the steps the school district will take (i.e., corrective actions and improvement activities) to correct findings of noncompliance;
correct all instances of noncompliance immediately, but not later than one year from identification of the issues (i.e., date reported to SED);
for issues of disproportionality, publicly report (e.g., public meeting, posting on school district website) on the revision of policies, practices and procedures; and
provide an assurance and documentation to SED that the school district has corrected all issues of noncompliance. (Further information on this documentation will be provided to individual districts based on compliance findings.)
SED may determine, based on the nature and extent of the findings in the report submitted by the school district to SED and/or the verification of that report, that a school district is in need of assistance, in need of intervention or in need of substantial intervention.
If a school district is identified as a “school district in need of assistance” for two consecutive years, the State must take one or more of the following actions:
conduct a monitoring review of the school district’s policies, procedures and practices;
require the school district to obtain technical assistance;
direct the school district’s use of IDEA funds; and/or
Identification as a “School District in Need of Intervention” for three consecutive years:
If a school district is identified as a “school district in need of intervention” for three consecutive years, the State will take one or more of the following actions:
any of the actions described above;
require the school district to prepare a corrective action plan or improvement plan;
direct or withhold the school district’s use of IDEA funds; and/or
impose special conditions on the school district’s use of IDEA funds.
Identification as a “School District in Need of Substantial Intervention”
If the State determines that a "school district needs substantial intervention" in implementing the requirements or that there is substantial failure to comply with the requirements, the State may take other actions, including recovering or withholding a school district’s IDEA Part B funds.
The following sources may assist you in addressing issues relating to the suspension of students with disabilities.
NYS Positive Behavioral Interventions
and Supports (PBIS)
https://www.p12.nysed.gov/sss/MentalHealth/PBISshort.htm
Special Education Training and Resource
Centers
https://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/techassist/setrcs.htm
National Technical Assistance Center
on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
http://www.pbis.org/main.htm
The Metropolitan Center for Urban Education’s
Technical Assitance Center on Disproportionality (TAC-D)
http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/metrocenter/tacd.html
Questions regarding the Suspension Self-Review Monitoring Protocol may be directed to the Policy Unit at (518) 473-2878 or the Special Education Quality Assurance Regional Offices at https://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/quality/qaoffices.htm .
Checklist to Complete the Self-Review
Activity |
Recommendations and Required Components of the Review |
1. School superintendent or designee selects the team members to conduct the self-review. |
|
2. Conduct an initial meeting of the review team to discuss timelines for the review and the process to review and collect the required information. |
|
3. Identify sources of data and information that must be reviewed. |
Review Attachment 2 – School District Self-Review Monitoring Protocol. Each section of the self-review protocol identifies specific documentation that must be reviewed. The sources of data and information should also include observations and interviews, as appropriate. |
4. Select a sample of student records to be reviewed. |
Compile a list of all students with disabilities suspended for more than 10 days in the current school year.
|
5. Complete the Individual Student Record Review Form for each student. |
Document findings for each student on the Individual Student Record Review form. To complete this review, you will need to review evaluations, minutes from CSE and manifestation team meetings, IEPs and disciplinary reports and notices to parents. |
6. Compile findings from the Individual Student Record Review forms; transfer findings to the Summary of Student Record Review form. |
This sheet provides a tool for you to summarize the number of instances of compliance and noncompliance. |
7. Compile all the results.
|
One individual should be assigned to collect the data from all the Individual Student Record Review forms and summarize the compliance findings on the Summary of Student Record Reviews. Compile copies of the Summary of Student Record Reviews and notes from implementation visitations and interviews for review by the Team. |
8. Convene a review team meeting to discuss the findings and analyze the data to identify the specific nature and extent of the areas in need of improvement. |
Upon completion of the review of documentation for each of the six areas of the review, the team should meet to review and discuss the findings. The team should question and probe data to determine relevant factors relating to the discrepancies (e.g., suspension practices at specific buildings; for specific disabilities, certain racial or ethnic groups, and specific types of placements) and to determine whether the school district’s policies, procedures and/or practices are in compliance with State requirements.
|
9. Submit the completed Self-Review Monitoring Protocol (Attachment 2) to the Superintendent of Schools or Chief School Officer for approval and certification of accuracy. |
The Superintendent of Schools or Chief School Officer should review the completed School District Self-Review Monitoring Protocol to accept responsibility for the accuracy of the compliance report. |
10. Submit a report to SED (see sample in Attachment 4). |
Due Date: Between August 1 and October 1, but no later than October 1. Manner of submission: Web-based electronic submission To submit this form, go to http://pd.nysed.gov The Superintendent of Schools or Chief School Officer must verify that the report to be submitted to SED provides accurate data and information. Print the Self-Review Monitoring Report after submitting the report for record-keeping purposes. |
Maintain all documentation
used to complete the self-review for seven years. Records
should be retained in an organized and easily retrievable format. All
documentation is subject to SED review.
SCHOOL
DISTRICT SELF-REVIEW MONITORING PROTOCOL
SUSPENSION OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School District:
Form completed by: (Name/Title)
Telephone/Email:
Date review completed:
[ ] Review required for significant discrepancy in the school district’s rate of long-term suspensions of students with disabilities as compared to other school districts. [ ] Review required for significant discrepancy in the rate of long-term suspensions of students with disabilities by race/ethnicity. |
Names and titles of team members conducting the self-review: For reviews required for significant discrepancy by race/ethnicity, indicate the name(s) of community representative(s) from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. |
DIRECTIONS This form establishes the protocol to conduct the self-review. The district must conduct a review of each area as identified on this protocol. Each page of the protocol provides the following information: Area to be reviewed: The six areas that must be reviewed include: 1. Individual Evaluations of Students with Disabilities 2. Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) 3. Behavioral Intervention Plans 4. Manifestation Determinations 5. General Procedures for Disciplinary Removals 6. Interim Alternative Educational Settings and Instructional Services Citation and Issue: Regulatory requirements that have been determined by SED to be most closely related to the area and suspensions of students with disabilities have been identified for review. Documentation and Evidence: For each area, the protocol provides a specific list of documentation (information to look at) and evidence (information to look for) that must be considered in the district's review of its policies, procedures and practices in the identified area. Number and Percentage of Compliance Based on Record Reviews: Upon completion of the individual record reviews, document the number of student records found in compliance for each citation. In the next column, calculate the percentage of compliance based on record reviews (total number of records in compliance divided by the total number of records reviewed). Determination of Compliance: Y (Yes) or N (No). A notation of Y indicates that the district is in compliance with the specific regulatory requirement. A notation of N indicates that the district is not in compliance with the regulatory requirement. The determination of compliance for some of the issues may be able to be made based solely on the review of individual student records. Instances of compliance noted for fewer than 90 percent of the records reviewed must be indicated as noncompliance. For other issues, the school district will need to consider other sources of documentation as indicated on the protocol. The team should carefully review all findings from all the documentation and evidence to make its determination of compliance for each citation. Findings: This page is to be used by the school district to document the review team's findings and to identify any corrective actions necessary to correct identified compliance issues. The district should also note any improvement activities necessary in the identified area, whether related to a compliance finding or not, to address the school district's significant discrepancy in its rate of long-term suspensions of students with disabilities. This form must be kept on file by the school district and is not submitted to SED unless requested. |
I. Individual
Evaluations of Students with Disabilities
The district's evaluation policies, procedures and practices must be reviewed to determine if students with disabilities have received appropriate evaluations upon which to base positive behavioral supports and services that would prevent the behaviors from occurring.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination
of Compliance |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8
NYCRR |
Initial evaluations of students with disabilities include functional behavioral assessments (FBA) for students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §200.4(b)(4) |
The reevaluation is sufficient to determine the student’s individual needs. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §200.1(r) |
FBAs identify the problem behavior, define the behavior in concrete terms, identify contextual factors that contribute to the behavior and formulate a hypothesis regarding the general conditions under which a behavior usually occurs and probable consequences that serve to maintain it. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §200.22(a)(2)*
conducted after July 1, 2006 |
FBAs are based on multiple sources of data, including but not limited to, information obtained from direct observation of the student, information from the student, the student’s teacher(s) and/or related service providers(s), a review of available data and information from the student’s record and other sources including any relevant information provided by the student’s parent. The FBA is not based solely on the student’s history of presenting problem behaviors. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §200.22(a)(3)*
* FBAs conducted after July 1, 2006 |
The FBA provides a baseline of the student’s problem behaviors with regard to frequency, duration, intensity, and/or latency across activities, settings, people and times of the day and includes information in sufficient detail to form the basis for a behavioral intervention plan for the student that addresses antecedent behaviors, reinforces consequences of the behavior, recommendations for teaching alternative skills or behaviors and an assessment of student references for reinforcement. | |||||
8 NYCRR §201.3(a) |
FBAs are conducted or reviewed when students are suspended or removed for behaviors that are determined to be related to their disabilities. |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
Individual Evaluations of Students with Disabilities
Findings | |
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended: |
II. Individualized Education Programs (IEP)
The IEPs of students with disabilities suspended for 10 days or more must be reviewed to ensure they include positive behavioral supports and services a student with a disability needs to prevent the occurrence of a behavior.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination of Compliance Based on Record Review and Other Findings |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8
NYCRR |
For students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others, the IEPs include positive behavioral interventions and supports and other strategies to address the behaviors. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §200.3(d)(1) |
The general education teacher’s role in CSE meetings includes identification of appropriate positive behavioral interventions and strategies for the student. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(e) |
The district takes steps to remedy any deficiencies in the student's IEP or placement as identified by the manifestation team. |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
Individualized Education Programs (IEP)
Findings |
|
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended:
|
III. Behavioral Intervention Plans
Policies, procedures and practices to develop and implement appropriate behavioral intervention plans for students with disabilities must be reviewed to ensure the district is taking appropriate steps to prevent the reoccurrence of a student's behaviors.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination of Compliance Based on Record Review and Other Findings |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.2(a) |
Behavioral intervention plans are based on the results of the FBA and, at a minimum, include a description of the problem behavior, global and specific hypotheses as to why the problem behavior occurs and intervention strategies to address the behavior. |
|||||
8
NYCRR
* For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006. |
BIPs identify the baseline measure of the problem behavior, including the frequency, duration, intensity and/or latency of the targeted behaviors. Such baseline, to the extent practicable, include data taken across activities, settings, people and times of the day. | |||||
8
NYCRR
§200.22 (b)(4)(iI) *
* For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006. |
BIPs identify the intervention strategies to be used to alter antecedent events to prevent the occurrence of the behavior, teach individual alternative and adaptive behaviors to the student, and provide consequences for the targeted inappropriate behavior(s) and alternative acceptable behaviors. | |||||
8
NYCRR
§200.22 (b)(4)(iii) * * For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006. |
BIPs include a schedule to measure the effectiveness of the interventions, including the frequency, duration and intensity of the targeted behaviors at scheduled intervals. | |||||
8
NYCRR
* For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006. |
The implementation of a student’s BIP includes regular progress monitoring of the frequency, duration and intensity of the behavioral interventions at scheduled intervals. The results of the progress monitoring are documented and reported to the student’s parents and to the CSE and are considered in any determination to revise the student’s BIP or IEP. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.3(a) |
When a student has been removed for more than 10 days and the student's conduct is a manifestation of the student's disability, the CSE conducts a FBA and implements a behavioral intervention plan for that student. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.3(b) |
If the student already has a behavioral intervention plan, the CSE meets to review the plan and its implementation and modifies the plan and its implementation, as necessary, to address the behavior that resulted in the disciplinary change of placement. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(e) |
Behavioral intervention plans are implemented, monitored and progress documented. |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
Behavioral Intervention Plans
Findings |
|
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended:
|
IV. Manifestation Determinations
The district's policies, procedures and practices relating to manifestation determinations (a review of the relationship of the student's conduct to the disability) must be made to ensure that students with disabilities are not suspended or removed for more than 10 days in a school year for behaviors related to their disabilities.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination of ComplianceBased on Record Review and Other Findings |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(a) |
The manifestation review is conducted immediately, but not later than 10 days after the decision to remove or suspend the student. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(b) |
A team that includes the student's parent, an individual from the school district who is knowledgeable about the student and interpretation of behavior and the relevant members of the CSE as determined by the parent and the school district conducts the manifestation review. Parents are notified in writing of the meeting. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(c) |
All relevant information in the student’s file including the student’s IEP, any teacher observations, and any relevant information provided by the parents is reviewed. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(d)(2) |
The manifestation determination is made based on whether the conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the student's disability or was the direct result of the school district's failure to implement the IEP. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.4(d)(2)(ii) |
If conduct was a manifestation of the student’s disability, the student is returned to the placement from which the student was removed (except drugs, weapons or serious bodily injury removals). |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
Manifestation Determinations
Findings |
|
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended:
|
V. General Procedures for Disciplinary Removals
The policies, procedures and practices of the school district must be reviewed to determine if the general procedures for disciplinary actions by school principals and superintendent’s hearings ensure that the rights of students with disabilities under IDEA are protected.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination of ComplianceBased on Record Review and Other Findings |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.7(a) |
The parent is notified and provided a copy of the procedural safeguards notice within 10 days of the decision to suspend the student for more than 10 days. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.7(b) |
Suspensions of students with disabilities do not exceed the amount of time that a nondisabled student would be subject to suspension for the same behavior. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.7(c) |
A manifestation determination has been made prior to the removal of a student with a disability for more than 10 school days. If the behavior is a manifestation of the disability, the penalty phase of a superintendent’s hearing is dismissed. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.7(d) |
Short-term suspensions of students with disabilities are reviewed to determine if they constitute a pattern of removals. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.7(f) |
School personnel consider unique circumstances on a case-by-case basis when determining whether to suspend a student with a disability. |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
General Procedures for Disciplinary Removals
Findings |
|
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended:
|
VI. Interim Alternative
Educational Settings (IAES) and Instructional Services
The temporary educational settings where students with disabilities are removed and education services provided to such students must be reviewed to ensure that students with disabilities receive the instructional services to which they are entitled.
Citation |
Issue |
Total # Records in Compliance (checked ‘yes’ or ‘N/A’) |
Percentage in Compliance (total # records in compliance divided by total # of records reviewed) |
Determination of Compliance Based on Record Review and Other Findings |
||
Y |
N |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.10(b) |
Students with disabilities of compulsory school age are provided with alternative instruction for short-term suspensions (10 days or less in a school year). |
|||||
8
NYCRR |
During suspensions of more than 10 school days in a school year, regardless of the manifestation determination, students with disabilities receive services to enable them to participate in the general curriculum and to progress toward IEP goals. |
|||||
8 NYCRR §201.10(e) |
During suspensions of more than 10 school days in a school year, IAES and the services to be provided to a student are determined by the CSE. |
|||||
Documentation |
Evidence |
|||||
Look at:
|
Look for evidence of:
|
Interim Alternative Educational Settings and Instructional Services
Findings |
|
Description of specific details of noncompliance in policy, procedures and practices: |
Corrective action required:
Improvement activities recommended: |
Individual Student Record Review Form
School District: |
______________________________________________ |
Building: |
______________________________________________ |
Person Completing Form: |
______________________________________________ |
Date of Record Review: |
______________________________________________ |
Student Name/ID: |
DOB: |
School: |
Race/Ethnicity: |
Grade/Program: |
Disability: |
Directions:
This form is designed to assist the team in compiling documentation of compliance findings. It is must be kept on file by the school district and is not submitted to SED unless requested.
Individual student records must be reviewed to look for information to determine if the student's individualized education program (IEP) has been reasonably calculated to prevent the occurrence of a behavior that may impede the student’s learning or that of others and/or that may result in disciplinary action. Each compliance issue must have a notation for each student record reviewed.
Put "Y" (yes) in the column if the item is present and meets compliance.
Put "N" (no) in the column if the item is missing or if the item does not meet compliance.
Put "NA" (not applicable) in the column if the item is not applicable to this student. An item should be noted as “not applicable” (NA) if it clearly does not pertain to the individual student. As examples:
- Documentation that the reevaluation includes a functional behavioral assessment (FBA) would be noted as “NA” if the student has not been referred for a reevaluation or the student has not been receiving special education services for three years.
- Documentation that the initial evaluation includes a FBA would be noted as “NA” if the student under review is a high school student but the initial evaluation was conducted when the student was in elementary school (i.e., too many years have passed for this to be a relevant issue; the requirement for a FBA upon initial evaluation was not in effect at the time the student was first evaluated).
In the "Source of Data/Comments" column, indicate where the data to identify compliance was found (e.g., IEP). Provide comments such as “the evaluation should have been in native language, other than English, but was not.”
Individual Evaluations
Citation
Issue
Y/N/NA
Source of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §200.4(b)(1)(v)
Initial evaluations of students with disabilities include a FBA for students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others.
8 NYCRR §200.4(b)(4)
The reevaluation is sufficient to determine the student's individual needs.
8 NYCRR§200.1(r)
FBAs identify the problem behavior, define the behavior in concrete terms, identify contextual factors that contribute to the behavior and formulate a hypothesis regarding the general conditions under which a behavior usually occurs and the probable consequences that serve to maintain it.
8 NYCRR§200.22(a)(2)*
FBAs are based on multiple sources of data, including but not limited to, information obtained from direct observation of the student, information from the student, the student’s teacher(s) and/or related service providers(s), a review of available data and information from the student’s record and other sources including any relevant information provided by the student’s parent. The FBA is not based solely on the student’s history of presenting problem behaviors. 8 NYCRR§200.22(a)(3)*
The FBA provides a baseline of the student’s problem behaviors with regard to frequency, duration, intensity, and/or latency across activities, settings, people and times of the day and includes information in sufficient detail to form the basis for a behavioral intervention plan for the student that addresses antecedent behaviors, reinforces consequences of the behavior, recommendations for teaching alternative skills or behaviors and an assessment of student references for reinforcement. 8 NYCRR §201.3(a)
FBAs are conducted when students are suspended for behaviors determined to be related to their disabilities.
*For FBA's conducted after July 1, 2006
IEPS
Citation
Issue
Y/N/NA
Source of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §200.4(d)(3)
For students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others, the IEPs include positive behavioral interventions and supports and other strategies to address the behaviors.
8 NYCRR §200.3(d)(1)
The general education teacher participated in the CSE meeting to identify appropriate positive behavioral interventions and strategies for the student.
8 NYCRR§201.4(e)
The IEP was revised as a result of any deficiencies noted during a manifestation determination review.
Behavioral Intervention Plans
Citation
Issue
Y/N/
NASource of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §201.2(a)
Behavioral intervention plans are based on the results of the FBA and, at a minimum, include a description of the problem behavior, global and specific hypotheses as to why the problem behavior occurs and intervention strategies to address the behavior.
8 NYCRR
§200.22(b)(4)(i)*
BIPs identify the baseline measure of the problem behavior, including the frequency, duration, intensity and/or latency of the targeted behaviors. Such baseline, to the extent practicable, include data taken across activities, settings, people and times of the day. 8 NYCRR
§200.22(b)(4)(ii)*BIPs identify the intervention strategies to be used to alter antecedent events to prevent the occurrence of the behavior, teach individual alternative and adaptive behaviors to the student, and provide consequences for the targeted inappropriate behavior(s) and alternative acceptable behaviors. 8 NYCRR
§200.22(b)(4)(iii)*BIPs include a schedule to measure the effectiveness of the interventions, including the frequency, duration and intensity of the targeted behaviors at scheduled intervals. 8 NYCRR
§200.22(b)(5)*The implementation of a student’s BIP includes regular progress monitoring of the frequency, duration and intensity of the behavioral interventions at scheduled intervals. The results of the progress monitoring are documented and reported to the student’s parents and to the CSE and are considered in any determination to revise the student’s BIP or IEP. 8 NYCRR §201.3(a)
When a student has been removed for more than 10 days and the student's conduct was determined to be a manifestation of the student's disability, the CSE conducted a FBA and implements a behavioral intervention plan for that student.
8NYCRR §201.3(b)
If the student already has a behavioral intervention plan, the CSE meets to review the plan and its implementation and modifies the plan and its implementation, as necessary, to address the behavior that resulted in the disciplinary change of placement.
8 NYCRR §200.4(e)
Behavioral intervention plans are implemented, monitored and progress documented.
*For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006
Manifestation Determinations
Citation
Issue
Y/N/NA
Source of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §201.4(a)
The manifestation review is conducted immediately, but not later than 10 days after the decision to remove or suspend the student.
8 NYCRR §201.4(b)
A team that includes the student’s parent, an individual knowledgeable about the student and the interpretation of behavior and other relevant members of the CSE as determined by the parent and the school district conducts the manifestation review. Parents are notified in writing of the meeting.
8 NYCRR §201.4(c)
All relevant information in the student’s file, including the student’s IEP, any teacher observations and relevant information provided by the parent is reviewed.
8 NYCRR §201.4(d)(2)
The manifestation determination is made based on whether the conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the student’s disability or was a direct result of the school district’s failure to implement the IEP.
8 NYCRR §201.4(d)
(2)(ii)
If the conduct was determined to be related to the student’s disability, the student is returned to the placement from which the student was removed (except drugs, weapons or serious bodily injury removals).
General Procedures for Disciplinary Removals
Citation
Issue
Y/
N/
NA
Source of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §201.7(a)
The parent is notified and provided a copy of the procedural safeguards notice within 10 days of the decision to suspend the student for more than 10 days.
8NCRR
§201.7(b)Suspensions of students with disabilities do not exceed the amount of time that a nondisabled student would be subject to suspension for the same behavior.
8NYCRR §201.7(c)
A manifestation determination has been made prior to the removal of a student with a disability for more than 10 school days. If the behavior is a manifestation of the disability, the penalty phase of a superintendent's hearing is dismissed.
8NYCRR §201.7(d)
Short-term suspensions are reviewed to determine if they constitute a pattern of removals.
8 NYCRR §201.7(f)
School personnel consider unique circumstances on a case-by-case basis when determining whether to suspend a student with a disability.
Interim Alternative Educational Settings (IAES) and Instructional Services
Citation
Issue
Y/
N/
NA
Source of Data/Comments
8 NYCRR §201.10(b)
Students with disabilities of compulsory school age are provided with alternative instruction for short term suspensions (10 days or less in the school year).
8 NYCRR §201.10(c)
and (d)During suspensions of more than 10 days in a school year, regardless of the manifestation determination, students with disabilities receive services to enable them to participate in the general curriculum and to continue to progress toward IEP goals.
8 NYCRR §201.10(e)
During suspensions of more than 10 school days in a school year, IAES and the services to be provided to a student are determined by the CSE.
Suspension
Self-Review Monitoring Report
to
the New York State Education Department
Due:
Between August 1 and October 1
But Not later than October 1
Directions:
1. Go to http://pd.nysed.gov
2. Log on using the same user id and password as assigned for PD data submissions.
3. Click on: Suspension Self-Review Monitoring Report.
4. Follow the on-line directions to complete the form.
5. Enter or update contact information.
6. Complete the statement of verification of accuracy form and have the Superintendent of Schools sign, indicating that the information is true and accurate. Submit to SED at the address indicated on the electronic form.
7. Using documentation from the Monitoring Protocol (Attachment 2), click the box under the “Yes” or “No” column as appropriate for each regulatory requirement. All citations must have a compliance indication.
8. Click “Submit”
9. Print a copy after submitting to SED from “view your data” screen.
Statement of Verification of AccuracyI verify that the information submitted in this report is accurate based upon the findings from the Suspension Self-Review Monitoring process conducted during the 2007-08 school year. Superintendent or Chief School Officer Date submitted: / / |
Directions: Transfer findings for each regulatory citation from the last column of Attachment 2, “Determination of Compliance.”
Citation |
Issue |
Are the district’s policies, procedures and practices in compliance with federal and State law and regulations |
||
Yes |
No |
|||
8 NYCRR §200.4(b)(1)(v) |
Initial evaluations of students with disabilities include a functional behavioral assessment (FBA) for students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others. |
|||
8 NYCRR §200.4(b)(4) |
The reevaluation is sufficient to determine the student's individual needs. |
|||
8 NYCRR§200.1(r) |
FBAs identify the problem behavior, define the behavior in concrete terms, identify contextual factors that contribute to the behavior and formulate a hypothesis regarding the general conditions under which a behavior usually occurs and the probable consequences that serve to maintain it. |
|||
8 NYCRR
|
FBAs are based on multiple sources of data, including but not limited to, information obtained from direct observation of the student, information from the student, the student’s teacher(s) and/or related service providers(s), a review of available data and information from the student’s record and other sources including any relevant information provided by the student’s parent. The FBA is not based solely on the student’s history of presenting problem behaviors. | |||
8 NYCRR §200.22(a)(3)* |
The FBA provides a baseline of the student’s problem behaviors with regard to frequency, duration, intensity, and/or latency across activities, settings, people and times of the day and includes information in sufficient detail to form the basis for a behavioral intervention plan for the student that addresses antecedent behaviors, reinforces consequences of the behavior, recommendations for teaching alternative skills or behaviors and an assessment of student references for reinforcement. | |||
8 NYCRR §201.3(a) |
FBAs are conducted when students are suspended for behaviors determined to be related to their disabilities. |
|||
8 NYCRR §200.4(d)(3) |
For students whose behaviors impede their learning or that of others, the IEPs include positive behavioral interventions and supports and other strategies to address the behaviors. |
|||
8 NYCRR §200.3(d)(1) |
The general education teacher participated in the CSE meeting to identify appropriate positive behavioral interventions and strategies for the student. |
|||
8 NYCRR§201.4(e) |
The IEP was revised as a result of any deficiencies noted during a manifestation determination review. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.2(a) |
Behavioral intervention plans are based on the results of the FBA and, at a minimum, include a description of the problem behavior, global and specific hypotheses as to why the problem behavior occurs and intervention strategies to address the behavior. |
|||
8 NYCRR |
BIPs identify the baseline measure of the problem behavior, including the frequency, duration, intensity and/or latency of the targeted behaviors. Such baseline, to the extent practicable, include data taken across activities, settings, people and times of the day. | |||
8 NYCRR §200.22(b)(4) |
BIPs identify the intervention strategies to be used to alter antecedent events to prevent the occurrence of the behavior, teach individual alternative and adaptive behaviors to the student, and provide consequences for the targeted inappropriate behavior(s) and alternative acceptable behaviors. | |||
8 NYCRR §200.22(b)(4)(iii)** |
BIPs include a schedule to measure the effectiveness of the interventions, including the frequency, duration and intensity of the targeted behaviors at scheduled intervals. | |||
8 NYCRR §200.22(b)(5)** |
The implementation of a student’s BIP includes regular progress monitoring of the frequency, duration and intensity of the behavioral interventions at scheduled intervals. The results of the progress monitoring are documented and reported to the student’s parents and to the CSE and are considered in any determination to revise the student’s BIP or IEP. | |||
8 NYCRR §201.3(a) |
When a student has been removed for more than 10 days and the student's conduct was determined to be a manifestation of the student's disability, the CSE conducted a FBA and implements a behavioral intervention plan for that student. |
|||
8NYCRR §201.3(b) |
If the student already has a behavioral intervention plan, the CSE meets to review the plan and its implementation and modifies the plan and its implementation, as necessary, to address the behavior that resulted in the disciplinary change of placement. |
|||
8 NYCRR §200.4(e) |
Behavioral intervention plans are implemented, monitored and progress documented. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.4(a) |
The manifestation review is conducted immediately, but not later than 10 days after the decision to remove or suspend the student. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.4(b) |
A team that includes the student’s parent, an individual knowledgeable about the student and the interpretation of behavior and other relevant members of the CSE as determined by the parent and the school district conducts the manifestation review. Parents are notified in writing of the meeting. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.4(c) |
All relevant information in the student’s file, including the student’s IEP, any teacher observations and relevant information provided by the parent is reviewed. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.4(d)(2) |
The manifestation determination is made based on whether the conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the student’s disability or was a direct result of the school district’s failure to implement the IEP. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.4(d) (2)(ii) |
If the conduct was determined to be related to the student’s disability, the student is returned to the placement from which the student was removed (except drugs, weapons or serious bodily injury removals). |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.7(a) |
The parent is notified and provided a copy of the procedural safeguards notice within 10 days of the decision to suspend the student for more than 10 days. |
|||
8NCRR |
Suspensions of students with disabilities do not exceed the amount of time that a nondisabled student would be subject to suspension for the same behavior. |
|||
8NYCRR §201.7(c) |
A manifestation determination has been made prior to the removal of a student with a disability for more than 10 school days. If the behavior is a manifestation of the disability, the penalty phase of a superintendent's hearing is dismissed. |
|||
8NYCRR §201.7(d) |
Short-term suspensions are reviewed to determine if they constitute a pattern of removals. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.7(f) |
School personnel consider unique circumstances on a case-by-case basis when determining whether to suspend a student with a disability. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.10(b) |
Students with disabilities of compulsory school age are provided with alternative instruction for short-term suspensions (10 days or less in the school year). |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.10(c) and (d) |
During suspensions of more than 10 days in a school year, regardless of the manifestation determination, students with disabilities receive services to enable them to participate in the general curriculum and to continue to progress toward IEP goals. |
|||
8 NYCRR §201.10(e) |
During suspensions of more than 10 school days in a school year, IAES and the services to be provided to a student are determined by the CSE. |
* For FBAs conducted after July 1, 2006.
** For BIPs developed after July 1, 2006.