Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002

 

Index of Slides : Text Only Version

  1. Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002
  2. The Bottom Line
  3. No Title
  4. No Title
  5. No Title
  6. Graduation Rates: Improving Data
  7. Graduation Rates: The Total Cohort
  8. Statewide, the four-year graduation rate of the 2002 Cohort was one percentage point higher than that of previous cohorts. The graduation rates of the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts increased by six percentage points in the fifth year of high school.
  9. The graduation rate of each successive New York City Cohort has improved. In the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts, 9 to 10% of students graduated in the fifth year.
  10. In the Big 4 Cities, 56% of 2000 Cohort members had graduated by the end of Year 6.
  11. In districts outside the Big 5 Cities, 84% of 2000 Cohort members had graduated by the end of Year 6. The decrease between the 2000 and 2001 Cohorts is due to more accurate inclusion of students in the 2001 Cohort.
  12. While the graduation rate of Black Students is unacceptably low, it has improved.
  13. The graduation rate of Hispanic students also increased.
  14. The graduation rate of White students has been stable across cohorts.
  15. At the end of six years, more than three-quarters of general-education students statewide had graduated. The graduation rate increased between the 2000 and 2002 Cohorts.
  16. At the end of six years, fewer than half of students with disabilities had graduated. The graduation rate decreased between the 2000 and 2002 Cohorts. The graduation rates for the 2000 Cohort were probably inflated by failure to report some students with disabilities.
  17. While the graduation rate of English Language Learners in the 2000 Cohort improved after five and six years, fewer than half had graduated at the end of six years.
  18. The graduation rate of female students is higher than that of males and has been steady across the 2000, 2001 and 2002 Cohorts.
  19. The graduation rate of male students in the 2002 Cohort was slightly higher than that in previous cohorts.
  20. Graduation rates vary widely based on student need and district wealth.
  21. No Title
  22. The Percentage of Students in the 2000 Cohort by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 after 6 years
  23. No Title
  24. The Percentage of General Education Students in the 2002 Cohort by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 After Four Years
  25. The Percentage of Students with Disabilities in the 2002 Cohort by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 After Four Years
  26. The Percentage of Limited English Proficient Students in the 2002 Cohort by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 After Four Years
  27. The Percentage of Students in the 2002 Cohort by Racial/Ethnic Group by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 After Four Years
  28. The Percentage of Students by Gender in the 2002 Cohort by Outcomes as of June 30, 2006 After 4 Years
  29. Graduation Rates: Accountability for School Districts
  30. The four-year graduation rate in Buffalo has declined.
  31. Rochester’s four-year graduation rate decreased as cohort membership increased.
  32. Syracuse’s four-year graduation rate for the 2002 Cohort was lower than for previous cohorts.
  33. Yonkers’ four-year graduation rate has declined slightly, but the cohort membership has increased.
  34. Total Public High School Graduates Each Year A record number of students graduated in 2005-06.
  35. The Bottom Line
  36. What Successful Schools Do to Raise Graduation Rates
  37. What Successful Schools Do to Raise Graduation Rates
  38. What Successful Schools Do to Raise Graduation Rates
  39. What Successful Schools Do to Raise Graduation Rates
  40. Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002

Return to Format List